For More Information On Training Measurement Services Click Here


Download Training Measurement White Paper


Join The Training Measurement Newsletter


Measurement Case Studies / Case Study (5)

Case Study: Comparing Skill Application to Measure Impact

Isolating the Impact of "High Appliers" vs. "Low Appliers" of New Skills on Win-Rate at a Professional Services Firm

This client trained their entire population over a short period of time, so we     did not have a "control group" of untrained people as a basis of comparison. Instead, we calculated the Definite Difference™ made by the skills on win-rate in a comparison of participants with "high" vs. "low" application.

 

Executive Summary

Business Goals:

  • Renew 90% of service contracts, sell additional services, develop more executive-level relationships

Performance Challenges:

  • Stuck in the purchasing department, selling on price not value, the competition is cheaper, and poor differentiation of services

Key Measurement Results:

  1. Improved win-rate pre/post the training (compare Graph 1 and 2)

  2. 20% more deals are won by "high" vs.
    "low" appliers of the skills (Graph 2)

  3. 8.3% pre/post increase in win-rate for
    "low appliers"

  4. 29.1% pre/post increase in win-rate for "high appliers"

Training Measurement Services

Graph 1: Win-Rate Before Training

 

Training Measurement Services

Graph 2: Win-Rate After Training

Approach

Custom Smart Trac™ surveys were created to track both application
and ability.

  • Training: a three-day consultative sales skills training program

  • Time frame: four months pre-training and three months post-training

  • Key measures: 8 skills, reinforcement activities, manager coaching, Smart Trac™ Success Stories, and requests for support

The Definite Difference™ made by use of the skills was calculated using performance data supplied by the client on win-rate in a comparison of participants with "high" vs. "low" application.

  • Time frame: 7 months

  • Data: win/loss reports from the CRM system and composite skill application scores

  • Statistical Significance Testing: results showed “very high significance” where the critical value of a one-tailed test was
    T = 5.4599, p < .001

View additional Measurement Case Studies.

If you would like to learn how our training measurement expertise has helped leading organizations across multiple industries quantify the impact of training and development, please contact us.

 

 

 
LSA Global | 3333 Bowers Avenue, Suite #253 | Santa Clara, CA 95054 | Toll Free: 800-889-6452 | Local: 408-727-2332 |  contact us    sitemap
Copyright © 2009 Learning Alliance Corporation DBA LSA Global All Rights Reserved.  All copyrights, trademarks, service marks and product names presented
in this web site are copyrights, trademarks, service marks, or registered trademarks of LSA Global or its Partners. 
Privacy Statement